Stablecoins Vs. Banks: The Battle Over Interest Rates

Published 04/14/2026, 07:14 AM

A battle is raging in the Halls of Congress between the banks and the crypto industry. The spark was a judgment by the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, which recommended that stablecoins be allowed to pay interest to their holders. As a result of the Genius Act, passed almost a year ago, stablecoins are required to hold, as collateral, 100% reserves of US Treasury securities. However, the act banned stablecoins from paying interest. Shortly after the act passed, the crypto industry began pressing Congress to allow interest payments to stablecoin holders. Doing so would effectively make them a direct competitor to banks for checking and savings accounts.

Thus, the banks, especially the smaller and mid-sized regional banks that don’t offer crypto services, could see a drain on deposits without an uptick in crypto business. Bear in mind that the assets banks buy and the loans they make require deposits to fund them. Losing deposits to stablecoins could sharply curtail their business. The President is generally pro-crypto and was a big supporter of the Genius Act. The question, however, that will come up for a vote this spring or summer, is whether the banking lobby will be able to persuade politicians not to allow direct competition via interest payments on stablecoins.

The graph below shows that the Invesco KBW Bank ETF (NASDAQ:KBWB) has decently outperformed the iShares Regional Bank ETF (NYSE:IAT) since 2025. If interest on stablecoins is allowed by Congress, we suspect the performance gap will further widen. Until there is more clarity, prioritizing larger banks over smaller ones seems like an appropriate allocation decision.KBWB ETF Daily Chart

Avis Leads Transportation Stocks

Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR) was up an astonishing 64% last week and a whopping 200% over the last month. A massive short squeeze is deemed the impetus behind its outsized move. Its 3.6% weighting in the transportation sector (XTN), coupled with its massive surge, helped the sector become overbought. However, the other top ten holdings are also overbought despite the negative impact that higher fuel prices will have on many of the companies. We share this in the second graphic.

As we share in the first graphic, technology continues to move from being the most oversold sector to one of the most overbought. It certainly outperformed the market last week in the relief rally. Despite oil prices remaining stubbornly around $100 a barrel, the energy sector has fallen from extremely overbought to fair value. As we noted a week or two ago, its incredibly high absolute and relative scores (>.85) were going to be very difficult to sustain. Over the last five trading days, technology stocks rose by over 4%, while energy stocks fell by over 4%. Extreme scores using this analysis, coupled with a relief rally on the Iranian conflict, were the culprits.

Last week’s price action provides guidance for which sectors might lead the way if the market continues higher. Conversely, if oil prices take another leg up, energy stocks, now at fair value, may be in a better position to lead the market once again.Technology Sector Performance

Transportation Analysis

Tweet of the Day

Michigan Consumer Sentiment

Original Post

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2026 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.